| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index |
| Date: | 2015-03-30 18:57:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRcaXUcQxR8rJtZaLwsbTCjWCQZ=vLj1Zmm5UeLa7+jLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> We have a database that has run into this problem. The version is 9.1.15 on
> Linux. I note in this thread:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM-w4HP34ppweGTCwjBZnWhQ0CmU-Lxna62vjKU8QRTWLOBuHw@mail.gmail.com
>
> That things appear to be fixed in 9.4 but they have not been back-patched?
> What is the current status?
I believe that Heikki said he'd backpatch that when 9.4 was considered
very stable. I don't think that we've reached that level of confidence
in the invasive B-Tree bugfixes that went into 9.4 yet.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-30 19:05:38 | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-03-30 18:50:48 | Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index |