| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in bttext_abbrev_convert() |
| Date: | 2015-07-01 05:38:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTvEtVDysXeE7Py-8Ar+-+XRAPkJCZe-FH_V+zWxmuS9A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> The regression tests have zero coverage for this
> tuplesort_performsort() "btspool2" case. That's a fairly common case
> to have no coverage for, and that took me all of 5 minutes to find.
BTW, I looked here because I added a bunch of sortsupport stuff to
_bt_load() in 9.5. It appears that that new code is entirely without
coverage.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-07-01 05:52:59 | Re: WAL-related tools and .paritial WAL file |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-07-01 05:37:23 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |