From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) |
Date: | 2017-06-29 04:24:44 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YEfJjqLd8mJYMyTWeMia-TYLUi0-c=OPBTeni=2b5eX7w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29 June 2017 at 12:23, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> It does. But I don't see anywhere that extra round trips have been discussed.
Ah, right, they're implied by having the server respond with some
downversion message and ignore input until the client sends a new
startup message. That'll only happen when a too-new client connects to
an older server, but that's probably not an especially unusual case.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-06-29 04:45:51 | Re: asynchronous execution |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-06-29 04:23:00 | Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) |