| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_shmem_allocations & documentation |
| Date: | 2020-12-15 01:09:35 |
| Message-ID: | X9gMzydxk34TwW4/@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:33:06AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> </para>
> <para>
> The offset at which the allocation starts. NULL for anonymous
> - allocations and unused memory.
> + allocations, since details related to them are not known.
> </para></entry>
Both of you seem to agree about having more details about that, which
is fine by me at the end. Horiguchi-san, do you have more thoughts to
offer? Benoit's version is similar to yours, just simpler.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | yuzuko | 2020-12-15 01:46:26 | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-12-15 01:05:49 | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |