| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can a child process detect postmaster death when in pg_usleep? |
| Date: | 2021-07-06 08:07:53 |
| Message-ID: | YOQPWVueHM6dalt1@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | tỷ lệ kèo bóng |
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:42:21PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I'm sorry to say that I didn't get what was said above. We reset the
> latch after we come out of WaitLatch but not before going to wait. And
> the reason to have WL_LATCH_SET, is to exit the wait loop if MyLatch
> is set for that process because of other SetLatch events. Am I missing
> something here?
Did you test the patch with post_auth_delay and a backend connection,
making sure that the delay gets correctly applied? I did, and that
was not working here.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-07-06 08:20:46 | Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-07-06 08:04:15 | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |