| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: partition tree inspection functions |
| Date: | 2018-07-30 13:21:34 |
| Message-ID: | a234a836-a7af-30fd-c43d-0177d7899560@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit,
On 07/30/2018 05:21 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> As 0 is a valid return value for root nodes I think we should use -1
>> instead for these cases.
>
> Makes sense, changed to be that way.
>
Looks good, the documentation for pg_partition_level could be expanded
to describe the -1 scenario.
New status: Ready for Committer
Best regards,
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-07-30 13:26:30 | Re: Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-07-30 13:10:50 | Re: Usability fail with psql's \dp command |