| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | separate serial_schedule useful? |
| Date: | 2017-10-06 19:37:09 |
| Message-ID: | a37e9c57-22d4-1b82-1270-4501cd2e984e@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed that the test "hash_func" was listed in parallel_schedule but
not in serial_schedule. I have seen that a few times recently where a
patch proposes to add a new test file but forgets to add it to the
serial_schedule.
I wonder whether it's still useful to keep two separate test lists. I
think we could just replace make installcheck with what make
installcheck-parallel MAX_CONNECTIONS=1 does. Thoughts?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-06 20:16:06 | Re: separate serial_schedule useful? |
| Previous Message | Nico Williams | 2017-10-06 19:36:54 | Re: [PATCH] A hook for session start |