| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add Boolean node |
| Date: | 2021-12-28 07:59:19 |
| Message-ID: | a5daf7ca-5a39-69e4-4d5e-ff43dd2cacb0@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | tỷ lệ kèo bóng |
On 27.12.21 14:15, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> That looks like a good change. I wonder what motivates that now? Why
> wasn't it added when the usages grew? Are there more Boolean usages
> planned?
Mainly, I was looking at Integer/makeInteger() and noticed that most
uses of those weren't actually integers but booleans. This change makes
it clearer which is which.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sascha Kuhl | 2021-12-28 08:28:30 | Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication |
| Previous Message | Jeevan Ladhe | 2021-12-28 07:41:53 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |