From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: pgbench randomness initialization |
Date: | 2018-03-16 13:58:19 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.20.1803161457140.11977@lancre |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> But now the documentation is back to its original state of silence on
> what base or how many bases might be allowed. Could it just say
> "or an unsigned decimal integer value"? Then no one will wonder.
Done in the attached.
Thanks for the reviews.
--
Fabien.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench-seed-10.patch | text/plain | 12.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-16 14:29:04 | Re: "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" is not quite as silly as it appears |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2018-03-16 13:44:31 | Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask |