| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bradley DeJong <bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re[2]: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData |
| Date: | 2018-08-27 06:43:02 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.21.1808270833240.11066@lancre |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
My 0.02€ on the text:
> Version 2.0 of the <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> protocol
>
> In the v3.0 protocol,
>
> the 3.0 protocol
>
> version 3.0 of the copy-in/copy-out sub-protocol
>
> the V2.0 protocol.
While reading nice English (I learned "holdover"), it occurs to me that
references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
Should it use v, V or version?
I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version, and "the
version X.0 protocol" for long if really desired.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-27 07:11:48 | some more error location support |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-27 06:34:17 | pg_dump test instability |