| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tag typos in "catalog.sgml" |
| Date: | 2020-06-23 04:32:53 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006230630310.2099348@pseudo |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bonjour Michaël,
>> Should it be backpatched? I'm not sure what the usual practice is wrt to
>> small fixes in the doc.
>
> The text is right, and this impacts only the appearance of the text,
> so I did not see that this was enough for a backpatch.
Ok. It would mean that possible other doc patches on the same area would
not backpatch easily, but the doc is expected to be more or less frozen
for a given version. So fine with me.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-06-23 04:43:07 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-06-23 04:29:06 | Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup |