| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is it time to kill support for very old servers? |
| Date: | 2017-10-16 20:59:59 |
| Message-ID: | c0c17fb5-3e89-10f0-bf75-7f72a85396b4@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/20/17 04:32, Andres Freund wrote:
> Here's what I roughly was thinking of. I don't quite like the name, and
> the way the version is specified for libpq (basically just the "raw"
> integer).
"forced_protocol_version" reads wrong to me. I think
"force_protocol_version" might be better. Other than that, no issues
with this concept.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-10-16 21:08:33 | Re: Is it time to kill support for very old servers? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-10-16 20:59:32 | EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) reports bogus temporary buffer reads |