| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres with pthread |
| Date: | 2017-12-06 17:26:58 |
| Message-ID: | c1fbb153-8850-fc6c-d98e-892a048d3e16@proxel.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/06/2017 06:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think the biggest problem with doing this for real is that it's a huge
> project, and that it'll take a long time.
An additional issue is that this could break a lot of extensions and in
a way that it is not apparent at compile time. This means we may need to
break all extensions to force extensions authors to check if they are
thread safe.
I do not like making life hard for out extension community, but if the
gains are big enough it might be worth it.
> Thanks for working on this!
Seconded.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-06 17:28:29 | Re: Postgres with pthread |
| Previous Message | Adam Brusselback | 2017-12-06 17:24:19 | Re: Postgres with pthread |