| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Monitoring roles patch |
| Date: | 2017-03-24 04:53:12 |
| Message-ID: | d3e2e808-50fd-daca-fc07-8863930cae7d@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/22/17 09:17, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> If we do it via GRANTs instead, then users can easily extend it.
> The intent here is that users will *also* be able to do it via GRANTs if
> they wish to.
But why not do it with GRANTs in the first place then?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-24 05:11:47 | Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-03-24 04:36:08 | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |