From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: hashagg slowdown due to spill changes |
Date: | 2020-06-15 06:09:55 |
Message-ID: | e19a19bf2ec75db916ad85f324cb3596c4d8e196.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 11:14 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm somewhat inclined to think that we should revert 4cad2534da6 and
> then look at how precisely to tackle this in 14.
I'm fine with that.
> It'd probably make sense to request small tlists when the number of
> estimated groups is large, and not otherwise.
That seems like a nice compromise that would be non-invasive, at least
for create_agg_plan().
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-06-15 06:20:04 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2020-06-15 05:34:06 | Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command |