| From: | Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call |
| Date: | 2017-07-18 19:35:43 |
| Message-ID: | e4e43869-64ce-2bb7-6505-1c35077cf680@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/07/2017 14:04, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-07-17 23:04:43 +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> Is it v11 material or is there any chance to make it in v10?
>
> I think it'd make sense to apply the first to v10 (and earlier), and the
> second to v11. I think this isn't a terribly risky patch, but it's
> still a relatively large change for this point in the development
> cycle. I'm willing to reconsider, but that's my default.
Agreed.
--
Julien Rouhaud
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-18 19:45:53 | Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-07-18 18:44:01 | Re: More race conditions in logical replication |