| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY |
| Date: | 2020-06-24 08:12:38 |
| Message-ID: | f3723966-022a-fb74-06f4-3801f4fb7c1b@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/24/20 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I was checking some loose ends in SQL conformance, when I noticed: We
> support GRANT role ... GRANTED BY CURRENT_USER, but we don't support
> CURRENT_ROLE in that place, even though in PostgreSQL they are
> equivalent. Here is a trivial patch to add that.
The only thing that isn't dead-obvious about this patch is the commit
message says "[PATCH 1/2]". What is in the other part?
Assuming that's just a remnant of development, this LGTM.
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2020-06-24 08:20:42 | Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2020-06-24 08:10:29 | Re: Parallel copy |