| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Portability concerns over pq_sendbyte? |
| Date: | 2018-06-14 20:17:28 |
| Message-ID: | 10238.1529007448@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> How about not renaming the functions, but just change argument types?
Yeah, I didn't understand why anything else would be on the table.
We already changed their arg types for 11, no? This is just second
thoughts about what to change them to.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-14 20:23:06 | Re: Shared access methods? |
| Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2018-06-14 20:14:54 | Re: Microoptimization of Bitmapset usage in postgres_fdw |