| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait) |
| Date: | 2020-11-23 22:41:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20201123224145.GA1405@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Nov-23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Here's a draft patch.
>
> Here's another of my own. Outside of elog.c it seems identical.
Your version has the advantage that errstart() doesn't get a new
function call. I'm +1 for going with that ... we could avoid the
duplicate code with some additional contortions but this changes so
rarely that it's probably not worth the trouble.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-23 22:44:37 | Re: optimizer/clauses.h needn't include access/htup.h |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-23 22:38:54 | Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait) |