| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: optimizer/clauses.h needn't include access/htup.h |
| Date: | 2020-11-23 22:44:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20201123224437.GA1593@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, if you're feeling motivated to explore a more wide-ranging
> refactoring, by all means have a go at it.
I was contemplating commands/trigger.c this morning (after Heikki split
copy.c) thinking about the three pieces embedded in there -- one
catalog/pg_trigger.c, one in executor (execTrigger.c?) and what seems a
very small piece to remain where it is.
Just thinking out loud ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-23 22:45:20 | Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-23 22:41:45 | Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait) |