| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join |
| Date: | 2017-03-01 06:31:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K6UwWpAKVoyKqC4QnxespbyeH6o04UQmdPam7A38mVEw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think for now we can keep the parallel safety check for cheapest
>> inner path, though it will be of use only for the very first time we
>> compare the paths in that loop. I am not sure if there is any other
>> better way to handle the same.
>
> Done that way.
>
Thanks, your patch looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-01 07:15:15 | Re: Time to drop old-style (V0) functions? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-01 06:30:16 | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |