| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join |
| Date: | 2017-03-01 05:54:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uS2k-_ebuU9WDrLVFKf-FKqUF5QdVRqQtjnjf5nmC4QQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think for now we can keep the parallel safety check for cheapest
> inner path, though it will be of use only for the very first time we
> compare the paths in that loop. I am not sure if there is any other
> better way to handle the same.
Done that way.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| parallel_mergejoin_v8.patch | application/octet-stream | 15.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-01 06:30:16 | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-01 05:43:25 | Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join |