| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 17:22:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkcMOESrqcatEOFAEqGH7e8cpaB1gp3H7rkKTx3Qt6VyA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
> As far I can see, there is no any on-disk representation differece for
> *existing* indexes. So, pg_upgrade is not need here and there isn't any new
> code to support "on-fly" modification. Am I right?
Yes.
I'm going to look at this again today, and will post something within
12 hours. Please hold off on committing until then.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-06 17:26:23 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-06 17:22:06 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |