From: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Date: | 2018-04-06 17:20:21 |
Message-ID: | dd1d58e1-d323-3f29-1604-b3fbf00dee0d@sigaev.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
As far I can see, there is no any on-disk representation differece for
*existing* indexes. So, pg_upgrade is not need here and there isn't any new code
to support "on-fly" modification. Am I right?
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-06 17:22:06 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-06 17:11:14 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |